Close Menu

How Legal Representation Can Protect Either Side Of An Embryo Dispute

How Legal Representation Can Protect Either Side Of An Embryo Dispute

Disputes over frozen embryos often bring up very personal and complex legal questions when a relationship or marriage ends. One person might want to keep the embryos for a future pregnancy, while the other may not want to become a genetic parent. Sometimes, the disagreement is about whether the embryos should be destroyed, donated, transferred, or kept in storage. Illinois law now gives important guidance for these situations, but the paperwork signed at a fertility clinic and any marital settlement agreement can be crucial. When I represent someone in an embryo dispute, I look closely at the written agreements, the history of fertility treatment, each person’s consent, and the legal consequences of any proposed use of the embryos.

Illinois Law Gives Significant Weight To Written Embryo Agreements

Illinois significantly clarified its law governing frozen embryos through the Illinois Parentage Act of 2015. Under 750 ILCS 46/704.5(b), when intended parents no longer agree about the use of a cryopreserved fertilized ovum for medical purposes, the terms of the parties’ most recent informed consent executed at the fertility center or a marital settlement agreement entered as part of a dissolution, legal separation, or dissolution of civil union governs disposition. This provision became effective December 12, 2025.

This means the paperwork you sign at the fertility clinic is often more important than people realize. These forms may cover what happens after divorce, separation, death, disagreement, abandonment of storage, or other changes in circumstances. I can review these documents carefully to see if they include a clear and enforceable decision about implantation, continued storage, donation, or destruction.

A marital settlement agreement can also settle this issue. If spouses are divorcing and embryos are still in storage, I think it’s best to address what happens to the embryos directly, instead of leaving it to an informal understanding that could later lead to a legal dispute.

Illinois Courts Have Recognized The Importance Of Prior Agreements

Before the current statutory provision was enacted, the Illinois Appellate Court addressed frozen embryo disputes in Szafranski v. Dunston. The court held that mutually expressed agreements concerning the disposition of pre-embryos generally should be honored. The court reasoned that allowing people to make reproductive decisions in advance provides greater certainty than allowing those decisions to depend entirely on a later disagreement. Szafranski v. Dunston, 2013 IL App (1st) 122975.

The later Szafranski decision found that the parties had an enforceable agreement giving the woman control over the embryos and also concluded that her interests would have prevailed under the balancing analysis applied by the trial court. Szafranski v. Dunston, 2015 IL App (1st) 122975-B.

Today, 750 ILCS 46/704.5 provides more specific statutory guidance concerning disagreements over cryopreserved fertilized ova. However, cases such as Szafranski remain important for understanding how Illinois courts have treated reproductive agreements and disputes when the parties’ intentions are contested.

Representation Can Protect The Person Who Wants To Use The Embryos

Someone who wants to use frozen embryos may have strong personal reasons. For some, the embryos might be their only real chance to have a genetically related child, especially after cancer treatment, infertility, age-related fertility loss, or other medical treatments that affect fertility.

If I represent the person seeking use of the embryos, I would examine every fertility-center consent, written agreement, communication, and marital settlement document that could establish the parties’ intentions. Under 750 ILCS 46/704.5(b), the most recent informed consent executed at the fertility center can directly control disposition when the parties later disagree.

I would also look at whether the other person agreed in the past that one person could use the embryos after a separation or another important event. The exact wording is important. A document that requires both people to agree for certain actions can lead to a very different outcome than one that clearly gives one person control if the relationship ends.

Representation Can Protect The Person Who Does Not Want The Embryos Used

The other person involved also has important reproductive interests. They may not want a genetic child to be born years after the relationship has ended, or may feel that parenthood should not happen if they have taken back their consent.

Illinois law expressly addresses withdrawal of consent in assisted reproduction. Under 750 ILCS 46/704, an intended parent may withdraw consent to assisted reproduction before an insemination or embryo transfer that results in pregnancy by providing written notice or filing a legal pleading and giving notice to the other participants and relevant medical providers. A person who properly withdraws consent before the insemination or embryo transfer is not considered a parent of the resulting child under that provision.

There are different rules for what happens to embryos that have already been created and frozen. This difference is important. I would find out if the dispute is about taking back consent for future assisted reproduction, who owns or decides what happens to the existing embryos, who would be the legal parent of a child born from them, or if several of these issues are involved at the same time.

Parentage Can Become A Separate Legal Issue

Embryo disposition and parentage are related, but they are not identical questions. Illinois defines assisted reproduction broadly to include embryo donation, in vitro fertilization, and embryo transfer. Under 750 ILCS 46/703, a person who consents to assisted reproduction with the intent to become a parent may become a legal parent of the resulting child.

This is one reason I would not treat an embryo dispute simply as a disagreement over property. Decisions concerning implantation may eventually affect parentage, financial obligations, inheritance rights, and parental responsibilities. Those consequences should be considered before a settlement is signed or an embryo is transferred.

Illinois Visitation And Parenting Time Laws Generally Apply After A Child Is Born

Some people think that Illinois custody or visitation laws can settle an embryo dispute, but that’s usually not the case. Under 750 ILCS 5/602.7, Illinois courts decide parenting time based on what’s best for the child. This law looks at things like what the parents want, the child’s needs, how the child is adjusting at home and in the community, and other factors that involve a child who already exists.

Likewise, 750 ILCS 5/602.9 governs visitation by certain nonparents, including grandparents, great-grandparents, step-parents, and siblings. The statute concerns visitation with a minor child and does not create visitation rights involving a frozen embryo.

If an embryo is eventually transferred and a child is born, then questions about parentage, parenting time, decision-making, support, and possibly visitation can come up as separate legal issues. That’s why I look at both the current embryo dispute and the possible legal consequences that could come after a successful pregnancy.

Early Legal Action Can Prevent Irreversible Decisions

Timing is very important in an embryo dispute. Once an embryo has been transferred, destroyed, donated, or otherwise dealt with, the legal and practical situation can change for good. I can help decide if going to court right away is needed and if the fertility clinic should be told that the embryos are in dispute.

I also look at storage agreements, consent forms, divorce papers, messages between the parties, and any updates to earlier instructions. A strong legal case should clearly state what outcome the client wants, which document supports that, and what Illinois law says about the rights of everyone involved.

Frequently Asked Questions About Illinois Embryo Disputes

Who Decides What Happens To Frozen Embryos After An Illinois Divorce?

Illinois law now provides a direct rule for many of these disputes. Under 750 ILCS 46/704.5(b), if intended parents no longer agree about the use of cryopreserved fertilized ova, the most recent informed consent executed at the fertility center or a marital settlement agreement entered under a dissolution, legal separation, or civil union dissolution governs disposition. I would therefore begin by obtaining every version of the clinic consent forms and examining the divorce documents. The exact wording and sequence of those agreements can be decisive.

Can My Former Spouse Use Our Embryos If I No Longer Consent?

The answer depends a lot on what agreements were signed before and what action you want to prevent. Illinois law makes a difference between taking back consent for assisted reproduction and deciding what happens to embryos that have already been created. Section 704 lets an intended parent withdraw consent before an insemination or embryo transfer that leads to pregnancy, while Section 704.5 deals with disputes about frozen fertilized eggs. Because an earlier agreement at the fertility center might control what happens, taking back consent doesn’t always cancel out every earlier contract.

Can I Use Frozen Embryos If They Are My Only Chance To Have A Biological Child?

It’s possible, but the answer depends on the agreements you have and current Illinois law. In the Szafranski case, the Illinois Appellate Court looked at the woman’s inability to have a biological child without the embryos when weighing both sides’ interests. Now that Illinois has Section 704.5, I would first check if the fertility-center consent or marital settlement agreement settles the issue before turning to older legal principles.

Are Frozen Embryos Treated Like Children For Custody Or Visitation Purposes?

Illinois laws about parenting time and visitation usually apply to children, not frozen embryos. Section 602.7 covers how parenting time is decided based on a child’s best interests, and Section 602.9 deals with visitation rights for some nonparents with a minor child. Disputes over embryos are usually handled through assisted-reproduction law, agreements between the parties, and relevant case law, not through regular parenting-time schedules.

What Documents Should I Bring To An Attorney About An Embryo Dispute?

I would need to see all fertility-clinic agreements, informed consent forms, storage agreements, embryo disposition forms, marital settlement agreements, judgments of dissolution, any written communications about the embryos, and any later instructions given to the clinic. It’s especially important to find the most recent informed consent, since Section 704.5 refers to that document when parents disagree about what to do with frozen embryos. I’d also want to know if either party has already told the clinic to transfer, destroy, donate, or keep storing the embryos.

Speak With The Law Office Of Fedor Kozlov About An Illinois Embryo Dispute

Disputes over frozen embryos can involve reproductive rights, contracts, divorce law, assisted-reproduction laws, and possible future questions about parentage. Whether you want to keep and use embryos or prevent their use, I can review your fertility documents and other agreements to help determine your rights and explain your legal options under Illinois law.

The Law Office of Fedor Kozlov helps clients in Schaumburg, Chicago, and across Illinois with complex family-law issues. Contact our Schaumburg embryo dispute lawyer at the Law Office of Fedor Kozlov by calling (847) 241-1299 to schedule your consultation.

author avatar
Law Office of Fedor Kozlov, P.C.